Monday, September 23, 2019
II MA- HEL- GLOBAL ENGLISH
English as an
International/Global Language
English
enjoys the status of an international language at present. The spread of
English was influenced by many factors such as colonization, immigration to
America, and the growth of population. Outside England, English is used as the
first language in countries such as the USA, Canada, Australia and New
Zealand and as the chief medium of communication in India and South
Africa.
The
foreign learners of English confront two obstacles. In countries outside
England, English is being taught by non-native speakers of English. The first
difficulty is that though good textbooks are available for English Language
Teaching, Spoken English of
the foreign learner suffers from lack of exposure to the basic tunes and
stress patterns of English.
The
second difficulty has to do with the striking discrepancy between the sound and symbol in
English. To overcome this problem, many eminent writers and grammarians like Ormulum (thirteenth
century), Chester Herald (sixteenth century), and Dr.
Johnson (eighteenth century) have
suggested Spelling Reforms. In the twentieth
century, the Simplified Spelling Society of Skeat, Daniel Jones and Ripman, and the Society for Pure
English of Robert Bridges and Fowler, both
in England,
have focussed their attention on this problem. In the US, the Simplified
Spelling Board and Webster’s American Spelling Book deserve
mention. Professor Zachrisson, the Swedish
linguist presented a new idea called Anglic
[A New Agreed
Simplified English Spelling] at the World English Conference of
1930. He suggested spelling reforms on phonetic lines. Bernard Shaw too was in favour of a modified alphabet
with 40- 50 letters. Shaw’s followers have rendered his Androcles
and the Lion in Phonetica,
a system proposed by Shaw.
To
simplify the complexity of English, the concept of Basic English was mooted [suggested something for
discussion] by C.K. Ogden. It proposed a
world language with a fundamental vocabulary of about 850 motor words thought
to be necessary for basic communication. Basic English was tried out in
China and other countries of the world in the 1940s. This consciously developed
framework but lacked the naturalness and spontaneity of a living language.
British
and American English
Among the many varieties of English spoken outside
England, the American variety is the most prominent. It differs from the
British variety in its choice of vocabulary, structure and intonation.
Lexical [vocabulary
of a language] differences between the two varieties are due to
cultural and geographical factors.
American
|
British
|
gas
|
petrol
|
rates
|
taxes
|
baggage
|
luggage
|
fall
|
autumn
|
faucet
|
tap
|
American vocabulary also has new
coinages like water gap, backwood, carpetbag, hoodlum, top-secret and long-distance
call.
At the syntactic
or structural level, the differences are subtle. While in British English,
the use of the verb do is confined to habitual action, in
American English, it is used in a general sense.
e.g.
I don’t have money
This sentence in British English means I
generally don’t have money. In American English, it can refer to
the present situation. If the reference is to the present context, the British
variety would prefer I haven’t any money.
Americans
tend to use secondary stress in polysyllabic words. In words like secretary
and dictionary, the secondary stress is heard in penultimate (the next to the last) syllable
in American pronunciation.
The typical
American speech is marked by a drawl and a nasal twang (sharp, vibrating sound). The intonation pattern (the rise and fall in the pitch of voice) of the
two varieties also differs.
![](file:///C:\Users\user\AppData\Local\Temp\msohtmlclip1\01\clip_image001.gif)
![](file:///C:\Users\user\AppData\Local\Temp\msohtmlclip1\01\clip_image002.gif)
![](file:///C:\Users\user\AppData\Local\Temp\msohtmlclip1\01\clip_image003.gif)
you
![](file:///C:\Users\user\AppData\Local\Temp\msohtmlclip1\01\clip_image004.gif)
New Englishes
Postcolonial
Englishes with localised characteristics have emerged from the residue of the
Anglo-American political empires. The intermixture of English with the local
languages has resulted in exotic hybrid among which are Carribean English,
Indian English, various forms of African English and Singapore English known as
Singlish.
III BA ENGLISH - CLASS REVISION TEST
1.
Campbell was elected a Fellow of the _____________
in 1894.
2.
He is one of the ________________.
3.
When was he born?
4.
Campbell married ____________.
5.
What is Campbell’s full name?
6.
How many children did he have?
7.
Write the names of great lakes.
8.
Spectres are ____________.
9.
___________ is a body of water
larger than a cove but smaller than a gulf.
10.
“Purple”
is a mixture of _______ and ________ colours.
11.
Which word
in the poem means “pale”?
12.
Which word
means “become visible”?
13. ________ are steep,
rugged rocks.
14. __________ means misery or suffering.
15.
_______ words are repeated in the poem.
Friday, September 20, 2019
CLASS TEST
Class test
1.
___________ is the multinational company.
2.
“I don’t mind being bought. But I won’t be owned”.
Who says this? __________
3.
The play won _________ award.
4.
How was Om called by Ginni? _________
5.
Who is the real receiver in the play, Harvest?
6.
Jeetu’s age is _________.
7.
The fuel supplies were provided for _____ months
at the time of installation.
8.
The video image was beamed into the mind of
_____________.
9.
The play includes _________ for the first time.
10. Ma
ordered ___________ for herself.
NOTES FOR HARVEST- NOT EDITED
Harvest
First World
The United States, Canada, Japan,
South Korea, Western European nations and their allies represented the First
World
Second World
The Soviet Union, China, Cuba, and
their allies represented the Second World.
Third World
It referred to the developing countries of Asia, Africa, and Latin America
[Latin America includes all the Portuguese- and
Spanish-speaking nations located to the south of the United States. The
countries share significant similarities because they were colonized either]
Harvest is a play by Manjula
Padmanabhan concerned with organ-selling in India set in the near future. It
was first published in 1997 by Kali for women. Harvest won the 1997 Onassis
Prize as the best new international play. The play was published by Aurora
Metro Books in 2003. It is a critique of the commoditization of the third world
body.
Harvest is a darkly comic and unsettling
tale of globalism and organ harvesting in India. Harvest poses a potent
critique about how the “first” world cannibalizes the “third” world to fulfill
its own desires. The play is set in the future, at a time when
multinational companies have gone to the Third World not for software, minerals
or fabric, but to harvest organs for their rich customers in America. It’s
about India and the gritty Third World reality. Harvest is
set in 2010 when a destitute nation will be openly preyed upon by the richer
superpowers who have amassed everything. Harvest is a futuristic play
about the sale of body parts and exploitative relations between developed and
developing countries.
The
play is an ironic, sci-fi examination of the relations between developing and
developed countries. Set in the imminent future, Harvest imagines a grisly pact
between the first and third worlds, in which desperate people can sell their
body parts to wealthy clients in return for food, water, shelter and riches for
themselves and their families. As such, it is a play about how the “first”
world cannibalizes the “third” world to fulfill its own desires.
Harvest
is a dark, bitter, savagely funny vision of the cannibalistic future that
awaits the human race...a parable of what will happen when the rich denizens [a foreigner
allowed certain rights in their adopted country] of the First
World...begin to devour bits and pieces of the Third World poor. Harvest poses
a potent critique about how the “first” world cannibalizes the “third” world to
fulfill its own desires.
Summary
The play is set in the future, at a
time when multinational companies have gone to the Third World not for
software, minerals or fabric, but to harvest organs for their rich customers in
America. It’s about India and the gritty Third World reality. Set in the
imminent future, Harvest imagines a grisly pact between the first and third
worlds, in which desperate people can sell their body parts to wealthy clients
in return for food, water, shelter and riches for themselves and their
families. As such, it is a play about how the “first” world cannibalizes the
“third” world to fulfill its own desires.
The play confronts us with a futuristic Bombay of the
year 2010. Om Prakash, a jobless Indian, agrees to sell unspecified organs
through InterPlanta Services, Inc. [a multinational corporation] to a rich person in first-world for a small fortune. InterPlanta and the
recipients are obsessed with maintaining Om's health and invasively control the
lives of Om, his mother Ma,
and his wife Jaya in their one-room apartment.
The recipient, Ginni, periodically looks in on
them via videophone and treats them condescendingly. Om's diseased brother Jeetu is taken to give organs instead of Om.
In
Harvest, Om, a just-laid-off breadwinner
[(of an employer) To dismiss (workers) from employment, e.g.
at a time of low business volume, often with a severance package.] for a
struggling Indian family living in a cramped Bombay tenement, decides to sell
his organs to a shadowy company called Interplanta in hopes of reversing his
financial plight. Om’s family is monitored around the clock, receiving frequent
video phone-type inquiries and directives from the supposed organ recipient, an
icy young blonde named Ginni. Om’s mother falls into a stupor, constantly
absorbed by programs on the TV provided by Interplanta. The family’s lives
continue to go awry. The play may be set in the future, but it reflects
contemporary conditions as well. India, one-third the size of the United
States, has three times the population and almost 30 percent of its employable
labor force is out of work, and the country’s biggest problems are
overpopulation and inadequate education.
The
story, centers on Om who had recently become jobless. Joblessness, desperation,
cynicism are the defining national sentiment. Om, a just-laid-off breadwinner
for a struggling Indian family living in a cramped Bombay tenement, decides to
sell his organs to a shadowy company called Interplanta in hopes of reversing
his financial plight. The family portrait is an archetypal picture of
dissolution and decay. It is into this world of disorder that Inter Planta
Services brings apparent order and respectability when Om signs up to be an
organ donor for an American woman named Ginni because there are no other jobs
available for him in Mumbai. As the family’s life becomes more comfortable,
their relationships become more strained than they ever were in their poverty,
and eventually the whole family is at risk of losing not only body parts but
their souls and identities as well. The corporation, personified as three
anonymous, masked guards dressed all in white, gradually takes over every
aspect of their lives.
Guards
arrive to make his home into a germ-free zone. Om’s family is
monitored around the clock, receiving frequent video phone-type inquiries and
directives from the supposed organ recipient, an icy young blonde named Ginni. Ginni
pays him to lead a “clean” and “healthy” life so she can harvest healthy organs
whenever she needs them. Ginni begins to control every aspect of Om’s life,
from when and what he eats to whom he sees and how he uses the bathroom. In
fact, Ginni comes to control the entire family until the end of the play.
There
occurs a radical change to their dingy room and it acquires an air of
sophistication. The most important installation however, is the contact module
placed at the centre of the room to facilitate communication between the
receiver and the donor. The contact module and the apparent order brought in by
Inter Planta seem to create turmoil in personal relationships. The donor and his
family is kept under the constant gaze of the receiver as the module can rotate
round to face each corner and can flicker to life at any moment. Ginny compares
Om’s flat to a “human goldfish bowl” (Harvest 43) which she can observe and
amuse herself with. The concept of the design is to allow a watchman to observe
(-opticon) all (pan-) inmates of an institution without their being able to
tell whether they are being watched or not. Thus the inmates of the Third world
are trapped under the unrelenting gaze of the First world. This total
deprivation of privacy can be interpreted as the ultimate form of surveillance.
Om’s
diseased brother, Jeetu, is taken to give organs instead of Om, and the
recipient, Ginni, turns out to not be what she initially seemed. In a final act
of defiance, the seeds of rebellion flower in a “checkmate” ploy by Om’s wife,
Jaya.
Om’s
younger brother has abandoned the family homestead
[The dwelling house and its adjoining land] and earns
his upkeep as a bi-sexual sex worker, Om’s mother has been frayed [(of a person's nerves or temper) showing the
effects of strain] by years of want and penniless living. So much so, she sees
nothing amiss with her son’s trade-off, [an exchange where you give up one thing in order to get something
else that you also desire.] as long as she gets her long-desired
television set, her fridge, her microwave and all the other things that money
can buy.
Om,
on his part, is too smitten by the beautiful blonde — his buyer from across the
seven seas — that keeps staring down at him from the television screen and
drives him queasy [sick/unsettled] with her
tantalizingly delivered sermons.
When Jeetu, his brother returns unexpectedly, he is
taken as the donor. Om can’t accept this. He leaves to
get back his position as the donor. Jaya, his wife is left
alone. She was seduced into selling her body parts, for use by the
rich westerners. Jaya, the sensitive young wife seems to have
somehow managed to retain her not-for-sale soul despite the overarching gloom.
Characters
Ma
Being an uneducated lower middle class woman, with no
means of earning a livelihood, she represents a large chunk of the female population
who go through life as financial dependents on men.
“Ma” in Padmanabhan’s Harvest. All of them had to
lead submissive lives with their husbands. They were subjected to humiliation
and even physical abuse. Consequently, they now take revenge by wielding power
over their sons and daughters-in-law. They provoke their sons into ill-treating
their wives and derive sadistic pleasure from this.
“Ma in Padmanabhan’s Harvest hates her
daughter-in-law, Jaya, and lavishes all her love on her elder son, Om. But as a
result of her over concern, Om turns out to be a weak-willed, cowardly,
spineless man.
This gives rise to a dual personality in such women,
sycophancy toward the male holding the purse strings and tyranny toward the
other dependents.
While Om (the earning member) is addressed with
endearments such as “my only delight”, Jaya, her daughter in law and Jeetu, her
younger unemployed son, are abused. “ho-you”,“barren dog”, “pimping rascal”,
“soul’s disgrace” are some of the words she uses for them. Oppression can warp,
undermine, turn us into haters of ourselves
But this kind of survival comes at the cost of
loosing ones self and one can survive only by developing a sense of detachment
to people and surroundings. By the end of the play Ma is “through caring for or
about anybody ”. Even when the guards drag Jeetu away (mistakenly) for his
organs, she is interested only in watching T.V. The distaste which
women feel for their restricted life is well dramatized in the
method that Ma chooses to escape from this kind life. She buys a Super Deluxe
Video Coach. Once she lies down in it tubes are attached to a recycling and
bio-feeding processor that takes care of all her needs. Ma, who appears a
tyrant but is herself a victim of a repressive patriarchal society chooses to
cut herself off mentally and physically from it. She chooses total silence as a
route of escape.
A miniature version of the panoptic
[seeing the whole at one view] system can be perceived in Om’s mother’s total
absorption in the fantasy world. She willingly shuts herself off from all
outward manifestations of life. She is unmoved even as she sees her son Jeetu
being taken away by the guards for an organ transplant by mistake. The Super
Deluxe Video Couch she orders for herself is representative of her self-imposed
withdrawal. Om’s mother’s renunciation of the world is complete, unhesitating
and unquestioning. She chooses for herself electronic annihilation
[extinction].
Jaya
The gest which underlines the effects of the vice
like grip of poverty and patriarchy is where Jaya angrily wipes off the
kum-kum mark on her forehead saying “ my forehead burns, when I say the word
sister”, when she comes to know that Om, without her knowledge, has declared
her as his sister to the company employing him to donate his organs.
Jaya, in Manjula Padmanabhan’s Harvest, is the only
person to survive the power play between the First World and Third World
countries. While her husband and brother-in-law give up the fight soon, and her
mother-in-law succumbs to the material charms offered, Jaya alone maintains her
identity and establishes her right to be thought of as a human being.
Om does this to circumvent the precondition of the
company that the donor has to be unmarried. This gesture, usually associated
with widowhood, is useful in making the audience critique the mental anguish of
Jaya who does this when her husband is still alive.
Out of a job for over two years and hemmed into a
tiny house, the couple are increasingly frustrated over the quality of their
lives when Om finally gets an interview call for a job.
The catch being that it is from a company, Interplanta Services, that promises a luxurious life in exchange for signing up as an organ-donor for its wealthy clients.
The catch being that it is from a company, Interplanta Services, that promises a luxurious life in exchange for signing up as an organ-donor for its wealthy clients.
For Jaya the word ‘sister’ being used in connection
to herself and Om is like a death knell to her marital relationship. Her
actions create an empathy in the audience as it is on the basis of this
relationship, a large part of her identity, that Jaya is living in that
home. The pain that this distortion of relationships causes is reinforced when
Ma says “ But these aren’t words! They are people”. The word ‘sister’ negates
the very foundation of her life and so the gest forms a point of enquiry
into the circumstances forcing Om to take such a decision. For a person like
Om, unemployed and struggling to provide two square meals to his family,
calling his wife ‘sister’ on paper is a small price to pay if it ensures
financial solvency. The gest problematizes the desperate situation
in modern day society which forces a man to choose between being cut up/ dying
one day at a time and abject poverty.
When Jaya’s life seems to be at stake. Jaya comes to
know that she has been the actual target of the organ buyer, Virgil, and that
after using the bodies of both Om and Jeeten, he is now intent on impregnating
her with his seed mechanically to propagate his race, irrespective of her
wishes.
Manjula Padmanabhan’s Harvest tells the futuristic
story of a family in a third world country which becomes the “donor” for a
member of a first world country. Jaya, “passionate and spirited (2) is the only
strong character in the play. No other character, except Jaya, shows any
development. The play begins with Jaya and her mother-in-law waiting for the
arrival of Om, Jaya’
What characterizes Jaya is her boldness. She is the only one bold enough to ask questions during the mtallation of the contact module and the food supply. She puts up a resistance as her kitchen utensils are thrown away. Being dissatisfied with her marital life, she seeks distraction with Jeetu. She is aware of her sexual urges and finds fulfilment with him. Her compassion for him :makesher take care of him when he comes back sick and covered with sores. Again, she is the only one to protest when Jeetu is taken away instead of Om.
It is in the final scene of the play that Jaya evolves into the towering figure. When Virgil appears before her as an illusion created by the contact module, in Jeetu’s body, Jaya realizes that Jeetu’s body has been used by Virgiltoprolong his life:. Virgil had observed Jaya through the module and had grown to admire her spirited nature. He needs Jaya-”We’re interested in women where I live, Zhaya (sic).Childbearing women“ (95).His country has lost the art of having children and is now in the process of getting bodies from poorer countries to populate it. He entices her with sweet words and with the promise of sensual pleasures to accept the implant which will make her insemination possible. However, though she wants to attain motherhood, she is not ready to get it by sacrificing her womanhood. She demands that if he needs her, he come to her in person. He refuses because her world would be a health hazard for him. She inslsts that she will not deal with a phantom any longer. Finally, she blackmails him by threatening him with suicide. The play ends with Jaya setting the terms and conditions. She will take pills for staying awake. If he does not come when she runs out of them, she will kill herself. ”. . . I’ll die knowing that you, who live only to win, will have lost to a poor, weak and helpless woman. And I’ll get more pleasure out of that first moment of death than I’ve had in my entire life so far!“ (102).
In
the meantime, she tells him to learn to pronounce her name correctly. Thus, “her
spirit remains unconquered even in the face of insurmountable odds” (Molly 30).
The only way one can salvage one’s sense of pride and self- esteem is through a
willingness to die if the need arises- and through great courage and self
control. She fights for her rights as a woman and as a human being. The
dramatist ends on a positive note “that hope still lies in this woman, a symbol
of procreation’’ (Purohit45).
Thus, Jaya emerges victorious in this power play between man and woman. She does not succumb to the panoptic gaze of the contact module. The reproductive power of women, often seen as a debilitating factor, is made by the dramatist into a trump card. She seems to stress the point that in this matter woman will always score over man. “Penis envy” is supplanted by “womb envy”.
In an interview with Sunita Paul, Manjula Padmanabhan
savs that the play talks of the power equation between the first world and the
third world:
I hope it does try and address the duality of this
relationship. It isn’t purely first world-third world, power-powerless. The
power equation does flow back and forth. There is a dependence of the first
world on the third world which is recognised in real life. As people living in
the third world we are encouraged to think that we have nothing to give, but in
fact even today, we are actually giving our minds, our body and our labour to
the first world all the time. (39)
If we replace the first world with man, and the third world with woman, we have b3re the relation between them. What needs to be acknowledged is the interdependence of man and woman. In the same interview, Padmanabhan stresses this point: “The Ardhanarishwar concept appeals to me greatly. The idea of a joined consciousness that borrows from both sides” (41).
As Ma and Jaya await Om’s return, Jaya, knowing what
the job entails, hopes that he will not.
Cyberculture’s influence
Cyberculture’s influence in our lives and its possible
threat to human physical identity is well documented in Harvest. American Virgil,
posing as Ginni, seduces and controls the Prakash family. He uses gadgets like
the “Contact Module” or the “Video Couch” to disperse identity through
“cybernetic circuits”. Both the receiver and the donor assume new identities in
the digital arena. Harvest highlights important questions about “digitization”
of identities and separation from the physical form. Can a body “vacated” of
its owner be claimed by another? How is identity determined if cyberspace can
disguise one’s gender, class or race to divest them of their unique markers?
Problematization of identity in cyberspace is pivotal to the discourse of post
colonialism. For marginalized bodies identity politics and suffering is rooted
in the physical body. In Harvest, first world exploits the third world via
wireless communication and unlimited money. Jaya sustains a postcolonial
resistance to such capitalist domination. She claims her body, evocative of her
dignity, through the corporeal limitation of death − the postcolonial Other’s
triumph in the colonizer’s world of coercion and control.
The play “Harvest” contains political and social
arrangements. Padmanabhan writes about a futuristic live in the year 2010, when
legal, moral and bioethical debates about organ sales and transplants have been
overcome. The title “Harvest” relates to human organs which are taken from
people in the Third World within a fully institutionalised trade with body
parts. The scientific technology has advanced far enough to enable the
prolongation of human life by body-transplants. Om, a young Indian man
suffering from poorness and unemployment, sells the rights to his body parts to
a buyer from the Western world. In change for organs Om can improve the living
standard of his family with enough food and household goods: a toilet, a shower
and television, later a mini-gym and luxury items. Now they consume exciting
technological products like the contact module. This science fiction module
enables the family to communicate with the receivers.
Two opposite groups come into conflict in the
play: on the one hand Om’s impoverished family consisting of his mother (Ma),
his brother Jeetu and his wife Jaya, on the other hand the receivers Ginni and
Virgil, from Northern America and the company InterPlanta Services, represented
by three aggressive guards. These characters present the contemporary global
distribution of power, because Western companies dominate citizens in Third
World countries by economic relations. Ginni, a beautiful, young, computer
animated woman, wants to longer her life by living in bodies of other humans.
Finally Om’s brother Jeetu is taken against his will as a donor due to Ginni’s
decision. This stresses the disrespect for donors. After all, Om prefers to be
a donor and decides to submit to the power of the receivers although they don’t
offer a self-determined life. In the end Jaya and Virgil, who is another
receiver, fight via the contact module. Virgil lives now in Jeetu’s body and
wants to impregnate Jaya virtually. She denies, but demands real closeness and
trust. This means that Virgil should risk something for her and accept his
mortality. However, Virgil wants to push through ruthlessly followed by Jaya’s
threatening with suicide. The resistance of Jaya warns the reader or the
audience that one has to act or to govern instead of being governed like Om, Ma
and Jeetu.
Although the family members have the same enemies
they don’t start a common initiative against them. A consensus among the family
could weaken the power position of the receivers and the guards, but the
selfish relatives always argue. The receivers and the guards don’t respect the
dignity of the donors and treat them as anonymous group, more as goods than as
human beings. Ginni equips the donor’s household with sanitary stuff and food
for holding the organs healthy. The inhuman and brutal treatment becomes
obvious when the guards catch Jeetu instead of Om as donor:
JEETU (as he runs) You fools! Can’t you see I’m
not your man?
GUARD 1 (dodging around the others) Always the
same story - no one wants to pay their dues. Come on! It’s hopeless to run
away. (catches Jeetu) There - there! (as Jeetu struggles) I’ve got you now!
JAYA Don’t hurt him - don’t hurt him - oh he’s
sick! Please!
GUARD 1 Resistance is useless. (starts to drag
Jeetu kicking and struggling) we’ll have you knocked out in a second.
(Padmanabhan 58)
Every individual interest was excluded in the
name of the General Will. (42) Private life and psychic privileges are totally
ignored by the receivers. They keep the family under surveillance through the
contact module. The guards of the organisation InterPlanta Services function
like an army for them. Nevertheless the deal with organs is seen as a chance by
Ma and Om to improve their life. Ma, who is bored by real life, doesn’t protest
against the danger for his sons and watches the whole day TV. Finally she
orders a TV coach and stops having contact with anybody.
Padmanabhan
reviews the problems that globalisation brings. While Third World countries
have difficulties with misery, poverty and violence, Western nations are
wealthy, use modern technologies and live with pleasure. Nevertheless this
point is simplified, because the reality is more complex. In Padmanabhan’s play
the commoditization of organs is a metaphor for socio-economic exchange.
Nowadays numerous people in the Third World, also children, work for Western
companies under bad conditions. That is a significant reason, why “Harvest”
shows a scenario of neo-colonialism, even neo-cannibalism, where people from
India are exploited by superior Western science fiction humans. It seems that
Om makes a voluntary decision to be a donor, but he decides under pressure of
unemployment, starvation and poorness. Maybe he even feels responsible for his
mother and his wife, who both don’t work and haven’t a regular income. The
family doesn’t care about an individual way within their cultural identity, but
assimilates into the Western living standard. They don’t analyze the benefit of
TV or the contract with InterPlanta Services. Instead they live in affluence
what is a common wish in most economically underdeveloped nations.
Whereas utopian fiction describes happiness
within an ideal or perfect place or state or any visionary system of political
and social perfection, in dystopian fiction the reader is confronted with a
creation of a horrible or degraded society. The ‘roots of all evil’ exist,
because it is a dystopian play. It shows a negative picture of the future.
Under pressure of unemployment and his bad living conditions Om decides to sell
his body parts. He is not the only one who wants to be a donor. Many Indians
apply for this “job” and Om is chosen through a long and strict procedure. we
as individuals have a relationship with material things like property and
money. As a result many people are greedy and cannot imagine a life without
these things. In “Harvest” the meaning of money and property is very strong,
what emphasizes its dystopian character. Especially Ma develops greed for
property and consumption.
In conclusion, “Harvest” demonstrates the
contrast between impoverished India and wealthy West. This dystopian play bases
on political and social arrangements that are against human dignity. The organ
market in “Harvest” functions like a new slave trade where nobody of the donors
has the possibility of a free choice. ‘Roots of all evil’ in terms of Fredric
Jameson like the greed for property and unemployment are an important part of
the plot. Padmanabhan wants her readers and the audience to get aware of
problems that globalisation and capitalism bring. She criticizes the
exploitation of people in Third World countries by First World employers. Apart
from this Padmanabhan shows the pressure applied to donors, furthermore the
surveillance and violence that is used against the donor family. As a result
the family members lose control over themselves. Finally, this lost of control
of one’s life happens not only in the Third World but also in Western
societies. Sometimes people in responsible positions exert a lot of pressure in
order to accelerate decisions or to manipulate others. Therefore, everybody has
to be careful when deciding important matters in life. Open communication with
other people, enough information, support and education is necessary to avoid
exploitation and mutilation of vulnerable human beings.
Manjula Padmanabhan's Harvest: a Study"
Manjula Padmanabhan’s Harvest: a
Study The author Manjula Padmanabhan (b. 1953) is best known as a journalist,
illustrator, cartoonist, and author of children’s books and short stories. She
became a celebrity when her fifth play, Harvest (written in 1996; published in
1997), won the first prize in the first Onassis International Cultural
Competitions for Theatrical Plays in 1997. The characters In the play the
themes of economic exploitation, reification (=commodification) and
acculturation are presented through the mercantile as well as surgical metaphor
of body-parts transplantation. The Donors and the Receivers in the play
represent the natives of the Third World and the First World respectively. The
chief attraction for Virgil is of Jaya because she is the only person in that
house capable of procreation and genuine emotion. There is a passing reference
to a seer’s prediction that she would never become a mother. As prophecies are
often equivocal, the curse on Jaya may be in fact indicative of her husband’s
impotence. The illicit relationship with her brother-in-law must be seen as the
manifestation of her irrepressible yearning to become a mother. Though her
mother-in-law always finds fault with her sexual transgressions, she is the
only character in the play who is true to herself. She desperately protests against
the encroachment of colonial coercion and urban mechanization that enter in the
form of the Guards and Agents. Her thirst for motherhood remains unquenched by
the sham finger-play of her pitying brother-in-law. She is the only person who
stands her ground in spite of the devious argumentations and warnings of
Virgil. And she alone is fully conscious of the present condition: “It is not
really a life any more. We’re just spare parts in someone else’s garage –”
(34T). Ma Indumati Prakash, the mother of Om and Jeetu, represents the older
generation, preoccupied with the petty concerns of their narrow world. Her
self-centeredness matches that of Virgil, both being old and preying upon the
young for the purpose of seeking pleasure at the personal level.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
-
Harvest First World The United States, Canada, Japan, South Korea, Western European nations and their allies represented the Fir...
-
1. HEADACHE - R.K.NARAYAN R.K.Narayan is one of the most famous Indian Writers in English. He brings out in an amusing way how headach...
-
Judas Iscariot (died c. 30-33 AD) was, according to the New Testament , one of the twelve original disciples of Jesus Christ , and son ...